Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(7): 713-717, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274747

ABSTRACT

Candida auris is a health hazard because of its antifungal resistance and the potential to cause healthcare-associated outbreaks. To our knowledge, no previous cases of candidemia caused by C. auris have been reported in Japan. Herein, we report the first known case of clade I C. auris candidemia in a Japanese man with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who was medically evacuated from the Philippines. A 71-year-old Japanese man traveled to Cebu Island in the Philippines 5 months before admission to our hospital. He contracted severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the Philippines and was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in a local hospital. During his medical evacuation, we implemented precautions given his history of COVID-19 and pneumonia caused by multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex. His blood culture revealed that C. auris infection was treated with antifungal agents but he did not survive. No evidence of nosocomial transmission was found among other patients in the ICU. This case study determines that accurate detection of C. auris, appropriate antifungal agent selection, precautions, and patient isolation are crucial to prevent nosocomial outbreaks, especially in patients with a history of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization or international hospitalization. Medical professionals should recognize the risk of MDROs in international medical evacuation settings, considering the recent resumption of cross-border travel after the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Candidemia , Cross Infection , Male , Humans , Aged , Candidemia/microbiology , Candida auris , Candida , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Japan , SARS-CoV-2 , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Philippines , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/microbiology
2.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0276738, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2098753

ABSTRACT

Presently, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is spreading worldwide without an effective treatment method. For COVID-19, which is often asymptomatic, it is essential to adopt a method that does not cause aggravation, as well as a method to prevent infection. Whether aggravation can be predicted by analyzing the extent of lung damage on chest computed tomography (CT) scans was examined. The extent of lung damage on pre-intubation chest CT scans of 277 patients with COVID-19 was assessed. It was observed that aggravation occurred when the CT scan showed extensive damage associated with ground-glass opacification and/or consolidation (p < 0.0001). The extent of lung damage was similar across the upper, middle, and lower fields. Furthermore, upon comparing the extent of lung damage based on the number of days after onset, a significant difference was found between the severe pneumonia group (SPG) with intubation or those who died and non-severe pneumonia group (NSPG) ≥3 days after onset, with aggravation observed when ≥14.5% of the lungs exhibited damage at 3-5 days (sensitivity: 88.2%, specificity: 72.4%) and when ≥20.1% of the lungs exhibited damage at 6-8 days (sensitivity: 88.2%, specificity: 69.4%). Patients with aggravation suddenly developed hypoxemia after 7 days from the onset; however, chest CT scans obtained in the paucisymptomatic phase without hypoxemia indicated that subsequent aggravation could be predicted based on the degree of lung damage. Furthermore, in subjects aged ≥65 years, a significant difference between the SPG and NSPG was observed in the extent of lung damage early beginning from 3 days after onset, and it was found that the degree of lung damage could serve as a predictor of aggravation. Therefore, to predict and improve prognosis through rapid and appropriate management, evaluating patients with factors indicating poor prognosis using chest CT is essential.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Hypoxia , Retrospective Studies
3.
Allergol Int ; 71(4): 512-519, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1944051

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of allergic reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines has not been clarified. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a potential antigen in the components of vaccines. However, there is little evidence that allergy after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is related to PEG. Furthermore, the role of polysorbate (PS) as an antigen has also not been clarified. The objective of this study was to investigate whether PEG and PS allergies are reasonable causes of allergic symptoms after vaccination by detecting PEG-specific and PS-specific antibodies. METHODS: Fourteen patients who developed immediate allergic reactions to BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines and nineteen healthy controls who did not present allergic symptoms were recruited. Serum PEG-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) and PS-specific IgE and IgG were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Skin tests using PEG-2000 and PS-80 were applied to five patients and three controls. RESULTS: Serum levels of PEG-specific IgE and IgG in patients with immediate allergic reactions to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were higher than those in the control group. Serum levels of PS-specific IgE in patients with allergy to the vaccine were higher than those in patients of the control group. Intradermal tests using PEG verified the results for PEG-specific IgE and IgG. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that PEG is one of the antigens in the allergy to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Cross-reactivity between PEG and PS might be crucial for allergy to the vaccines. PEG-specific IgE and IgG may be useful in diagnosing allergy to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Polyethylene Glycols , Polysorbates , RNA, Messenger , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
4.
Respir Investig ; 60(6): 750-761, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1926868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of programmed cell death, especially pyroptosis and apoptosis, in unfavorable immune responses in COVID-19 remains to be elucidated. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to investigate the association between the serum gasdermin D (GSDMD) levels, a pyroptotic marker, and caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 fragment (M30), an apoptotic marker, and the clinical status and abnormal chest computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: In this study, 46 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were divided into the following three groups according to the disease severity: mild to moderate group (n = 10), severe group (n = 14), and critical group (n = 22). The serum GSDMD levels were higher in the critical group than in the mild to moderate group (P = 0.016). In contrast, serum M30 levels were lower in the critical group than in the severe group (P = 0.048). Patients who required mechanical ventilation or died had higher serum GSDMD levels than those who did not (P = 0.007). Area of consolidation only and of ground glass opacity plus consolidation positively correlated with serum GSDMD levels (r = 0.56, P < 0.001 and r = 0.53, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Higher serum GSDMD levels are associated with critical respiratory status and the consolidation area on chest CT in patients with COVID-19, suggesting that excessive activation of pyroptosis may affect the clinical manifestations in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Phosphate-Binding Proteins/metabolism , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Tomography , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 9147, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1873546

ABSTRACT

Recently, immune response to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has attracted attention where an association between higher antibody titer and worsening disease severity has been reported. However, our experiences with severe COVID-19 patients with low antibody titers led to hypothesizing that suppressed humoral immune response may be associated with poorer prognosis in severe COVID19. In this study, antibody titers in severe COVID19 patients were measured at 7, 10, 12, and 14 days after onset. Patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors. SARS-CoV-2 IgM in survivors and non-survivors were 0.06 AU and 0.02 AU (P = 0.048) at 10 days, 0.1 AU and 0.03 AU (P = 0.02) at 12 days, and 0.17 AU and 0.06 AU (P = 0.02) at 14 days. IgG in survivors and non-survivors were 0.01 AU and 0.01 AU (P = 0.04) at 7 days, 0.42 AU and 0.01 AU (P = 0.04) at 12 days, and 0.42 AU and 0.01 AU (P = 0.02) at 14 days. Multivariate analysis showed better survival among patients with IgM positivity at 12 days (P = 0.04), IgG positivity at 12 days (P = 0.04), IgM positivity at 14 days (P = 0.008), and IgG positivity at 14 days (P = 0.005). In severe COVID-19, low antibody titers on days 12 and 14 after onset were associated with poorer prognosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Antibodies, Viral , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Mod Rheumatol Case Rep ; 6(1): 101-105, 2022 01 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1443057

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is known to cause hyperferritinemia and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Including this laboratory parameter, symptoms similar to COVID-19 have been observed in adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD), catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, macrophage activation syndrome, and septic shock, which has led to the proposal of a concept called 'hyperferritinemic syndromes'. High levels of some clinical markers in both COVID-19 and AOSD make them difficult to differentiate. While the efficacy of ciclesonide had been expected for mild pneumonia with COVID-19, the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), which is a known treatment for AOSD, was not established. We report the first known occurrence of COVID-19 diagnosed in March 2020, preceded by the diagnosis of AOSD in April 2019. The patient was given prednisolone and TCZ, which led to remission. With the dyspnea and ground-glass appearance on chest computed tomography, PCR test revealed COVID-19 infection. Ciclesonide was started on Day 7 of the disease onset, which led to improved inflammatory markers. We infer that while TCZ is theoretically useful for COVID-19 due to its inhibition of interleukin 6. AOSD and COVID-19 may be differentiated by levels of ferritin, and appropriate treatment must be allocated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Macrophage Activation Syndrome , Still's Disease, Adult-Onset , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , Ferritins , Humans , Macrophage Activation Syndrome/diagnosis , Macrophage Activation Syndrome/drug therapy , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Still's Disease, Adult-Onset/diagnosis , Still's Disease, Adult-Onset/drug therapy
7.
J Med Virol ; 93(7): 4549-4552, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1141366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) diagnosis has been the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT). On the other hand, serological testing for COVID-19 may offer advantages in detecting possibly overlooked infections by NAAT. METHODS: To evaluate seroconversion of NAAT-negative pneumonia patients, immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG targeting the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 were semiquantified by an immunofluorescence assay. Seroconversion was confirmed by another serological method, targeting the nucleocapsid protein. RESULTS: Eight suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 pneumonia patients (median age, 39 years; range, 21-55) were included. The median period between symptom onset and NAAT sample collection was 6 days (2-27 days). None of them had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by NAAT. In contrast, all eight patients revealed seropositivity with the two serological methods, indicating actual seroconversion against SARS-CoV-2. The median period between onset and blood sampling was 26.5 days (7-51 days). CONCLUSION: Eight patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, initially tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by NAAT, were finally confirmed of the diagnosis by serological testing. To cover the whole spectrum of this heterogenous infectious disease, serology testing should be implemented to the multitiered diagnostic algorithm for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Adult , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphoproteins/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Seroconversion , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL